Camera Dojo

Kodak Ektar 100: what it looks like and how to shoot it

The short answer

Kodak Ektar 100 is an ISO 100, daylight-balanced C-41 color negative film that Kodak calls the finest-grain color negative film available, and a 35mm roll costs $13.99 to $19.00 at US shops (October 28, 2026).

Owners and reviewers love it for saturated blues and reds, very fine grain and sharp detail in landscapes and travel. The trade-offs: fair skin often turns red or pink, it wants bright light, and underexposure brings muddy, blue shadows.

Speed
ISO 100
Process
C-41
Formats
35mm, 120, sheet film
35mm roll
$13.99-19.00 (Oct 2026)
See sample photosWhat shooters say

Built from 141 opinions from 33 pages and videos. Not yet tested by Camera Dojo. Updated .

A 35mm cartridge of Kodak Professional Ektar 100 color negative film with the leader pulled out, on a plain light background
Photo: El Grafo, CC BY-SA 4.0

The short version

Ektar is the color film people load for sunny landscapes, architecture and travel. Kodak recommends it for nature, travel, outdoor, fashion and product photography, and reviewers describe it the same way again and again: the punch of slide film with the cheap, everyday C-41 processing of a negative film. It is a poor match for portraits of fair-skinned people and for dim light. If people are your main subject, Kodak Portra 160 or Portra 400 is the safer choice.

Good fit if

  • You shoot landscapes, travel or architecture in good light and want bold color.
  • You want very fine grain for big prints or detailed scans, especially in 120 or sheet film.
  • You like the slide-film look but want cheaper C-41 developing and a little more forgiveness.
  • You shoot long exposures or pinhole on a tripod, where ISO 100 is not a handicap.

Think twice if

  • Your main subject is people, especially fair skin. Most reviewers say it turns skin red or pink; Panorama Circle and The Darkroom suggest Portra 160 instead.
  • You shoot indoors, handheld at night or mostly on gray days. A 400-speed film such as Kodak Ultramax 400 or Portra 400 copes better.
  • You want a careless snapshot film for mixed light. Several owners say underexposed frames go muddy and blue.
  • You are on a tight budget and learning: Jon Mullin points beginners to cheaper Kodak films such as Kodak Gold, ColorPlus and Ultramax.

Photos shot on Kodak Ektar 100

Photos shot on Kodak Ektar 100 in 35mm and 120, shared under free licenses on Wikimedia Commons.

What owners and reviewers say, topic by topic

We sorted 141 opinions about the Ektar 100 from 33 pages and videos on 27 websites and channels. Each row shows how many people raised a topic and how many of them were positive. Open a row to read short quotes, each linked to its source.

Most of these opinions come from photographers' blogs, editorial reviews, five YouTube reviews and the Flickr Ektar group. Reddit, Photrio, PetaPixel and big-retailer reviews could not be read, so everyday owner voices are thinner than we'd like. Consistency has only four opinions, and no source discussed halation, so that topic is missing.

  1. Exposure latitude46% positiveof 24

    The most divided topic. Many owners say it takes two or three stops of overexposure well and survives mistakes, while others compare its latitude to slide film and warn that underexposure turns shadows muddy, purple or blue.

  2. Skin tones5% positiveof 20

    The film's best-known weakness: most reviewers say fair skin turns red, pink, orange or magenta, especially in hard sun or when underexposed. A few say environmental portraits, open shade and careful metering work, and one found skin accurate in the right scene.

  3. Color74% positiveof 19

    Nearly everyone praises the saturated color, especially blues, blue-greens and reds. The mixed voices mention a teal cast in some skies or prefer Portra for accurate color, and one owner struggled to get good greens in shaded, low-light scenes.

  4. Grain85% positiveof 13

    Almost everyone calls the grain extremely fine, close to slide film and barely visible in 120 and sheet sizes. One reviewer wishes for more grain character, and one beginner saw harsh grain on his first 35mm rolls.

    • “Ektar 100 has outstanding fine grain structure”

      Tahusa analog film reviewOwner

    • “Grain is really fine in 35mm and almost inexistent in bigger formats.”

      Carlos Garcia Photo 2017-10Owner

    • “It's a very fine grain that almost looks like slide film in it's granularity.”

      Jon Mullin PhotographyOwner

    • “Ektar is near grain-less at size when compared to other 100 speed print films.”

      Johnny Martyr 2016-07Owner

  5. Low light and night23% positiveof 13

    Mostly negative: ISO 100 is slow for indoor, gray-day and handheld night shooting. The positive voices talk about tripod work, where owners report little reciprocity trouble before 10 seconds to about a minute.

    • “Low-light situations, I'd rather get a different film than pushing Ektar.”

      Carlos Garcia Photo 2017-10Owner

    • “Ektar wants sun. If you hand it a flat grey day, the color goes quiet, sometimes a little cold.”

      Raf Lopes, Camera Clara 2026-07Owner

    • “It only comes in the speed of 100, so low light shooting isn't the best situation for this film.”

      Jon Mullin PhotographyOwner

    • “reciprocity failure doesn't come in until around 10 seconds”

      Exaframe (Hashem McAdam) 2020-09Owner

  6. Overall look85% positiveof 13

    Owners describe a slide-film look with negative-film forgiveness, and many call it their landscape favorite. The two mixed voices admire it but would reach for Portra, or usually dislike Ektar.

  7. Pushing and pulling40% positiveof 10

    Split down the middle. Some pushed it one or two stops and liked the extra color and contrast; others got purple shadows, a strong blue shift and harsh contrast at ISO 400 and say box speed is best.

  8. Scanning and printing40% positiveof 10

    Reviewers agree the scan makes or breaks Ektar. Several say the negatives scan cleanly and enlarge well, but lab presets and auto-correction often give blue, odd or washed-out color.

  9. Price and availability63% positiveof 8

    Most find it fairly priced for a professional film, easy to find and cheaper per frame than slide film. One owner says the price limits how often he shoots it.

  10. Sharpness and detail100% positiveof 7

    Every source that mentions it calls Ektar very sharp, with detail limited more by the lens than by the film.

    • “It's one of the, if not the, sharpest films I've ever experienced.”

      Jon Mullin PhotographyOwner

    • “Ektar will happily out-resolve most lenses that sensible people are likely to own”

      Shutter (Lewis Collard)Owner

    • “Ektar scans are always sharper than those from Portra 160/400 and most b/w stocks I shoot”

      Josh Harmon Images 2017-03Owner

    • “Ektar 100 comes close to challenge slightly older digital cameras in resolution in my perception.”

      PanoramaCircle, Panorama Circle 2018-08Owner

  11. Consistency25% positiveof 4

    Few people discuss it. One reviewer calls the results predictable, while others find them hit or miss depending on the light and the scan.

PositiveMixedNegative

How to shoot Kodak Ektar 100

Ektar is easy to load and develop. Getting the exposure right in good light is most of the job.

  1. 1

    Set the camera to ISO 100, or a bit slower

    The 35mm cartridge is DX coded, so cameras that read DX codes set ISO 100 themselves. Some owners in the Flickr Ektar group rate it at EI 64 or 80, or a third of a stop slower, to avoid underexposure; that is owner practice, not Kodak's advice.

  2. 2

    Shoot in bright light

    Casual Photophile says you need bright light to get the most from it. According to Kodak's data sheet, start at 1/125 second at f/11 in bright or hazy sun with distinct shadows, f/8 in weak hazy sun, f/5.6 on a cloudy bright day and f/4 in heavy overcast or open shade. The sunny 16 rule explains how to work without a meter.

  3. 3

    Meter carefully and err toward overexposure

    A blue cast is the first sign of underexposure, according to the Flickr group, and Tahusa saw purple shadows at just a third to two-thirds of a stop under. Lewis Collard would rather give a stop or two extra than bracket, but Camera Clara warns that highlights clip sooner than on Portra.

  4. 4

    Put people in open shade

    An Emulsive reviewer says skin looks good in shade and gets funky in direct sun. Casual Photophile adds that a little overexposure helps lighter skin.

  5. 5

    Use a tripod after dark

    Kodak's data sheet needs no correction from 1/10,000 second to 1 second. For a normal night street scene, Lewis Collard's starting point is 20 or 25 seconds at f/8.

  6. 6

    Send it to any C-41 lab

    Ektar is standard C-41 film, so any color lab can develop it. The Darkroom's mail-in 35mm developing with scans starts at $14 a roll, plus $6.95 round-trip shipping (checked October 28, 2026).

Sources: filmphotographystore.com, flickr.com, casualphotophile.com, kodakprofessional.com, tahusa.co, shutter.lewiscollard.com, cameraclara.com, emulsive.org, thedarkroom.com

Is Kodak Ektar 100 good for portraits?

Portra 160

It can work, but it is the film's weakest spot. Lewis Collard calls Ektar wonderful for everything except photos of white people, Jon Mullin sees skin pick up more red and magenta than he likes, and Carlos Garcia got an orange cast and would not use it for a proper portrait session. Camera Clara found skin went muddy in hard sun.

Not everyone agrees on how bad it is. The CWO saw a red hue on fair skin but little effect on Southeast Asian skin, Johnny Martyr found skin accurate in the right scene, and Exaframe thinks many bad results with people photos come from poor metering or scanning.

If you do shoot people on Ektar, reviewers offer three fixes: find open shade (Emulsive), give a little extra exposure (Casual Photophile) and frame wider. James Madison Photography accepts it for environmental portraits but finds tight portraits too saturated, and Shoot It With Film says overexposing works for her except on faces. For neutral skin, The Darkroom and Panorama Circle point to Kodak Portra 160.

The Darkroom notes that Ektar renders reds strongly, so skin can shift warm or slightly red depending on lighting and subject; open shade is the fix Emulsive recommends.

Sources: shutter.lewiscollard.com, jonmullin.com, carlosgrphoto.com, cameraclara.com, thecwo.com, johnnymartyr.wordpress.com, exaframe.com, emulsive.org, casualphotophile.com, jamesmadisonphotography.wordpress.com, thedarkroom.com, panoramacircle.com, shootitwithfilm.com

Ektar 100 exposure latitude and pushing

Kodak's current data sheet does not list a latitude figure. Lewis Collard and Casual Photophile both say Kodak rates Ektar at two stops of overexposure and one of underexposure, though Casual Photophile thinks the film can do better than that.

Owners split on how forgiving it is. A Flickr group member compares its latitude to slide film, Panorama Circle calls it limited, and Jon Mullin finds shadow recovery weaker than on Portra 160. Jake Horn, after two years with it, says the common advice to expose Ektar for the highlights, like slide film, sells its latitude short, and a customer on The Darkroom overexposes by more than two stops in a meterless camera and still likes the results. Kyle McDougall's exposure test video found two to three stops over gave pleasing, warmer images, two to three stops under gave flat, muddy shadows, and five stops over brought yellow shifts and blown highlights.

Pushing is a look, not a rescue. Pushed to ISO 400, Lewis Collard got heavy contrast, super-saturated reds and an extreme blue shift, and Tahusa warns of a purple tint in dark areas. One Darkroom customer review stopped at ISO 200, while another customer pushed it one and two stops and found it more versatile than expected. On the other side, Johnny Martyr says it handles push processing easily, and Shoot It With Film liked the colors and contrast at 400. Ask your lab about push fees first, and see how to push and pull film for the basics.

When unsure, give Ektar more light rather than less, but not as much extra as you would give Portra.

Sources: shutter.lewiscollard.com, casualphotophile.com, panoramacircle.com, flickr.com, jonmullin.com, jakehornphotography.com, thedarkroom.com, youtube.com, tahusa.co, johnnymartyr.wordpress.com, shootitwithfilm.com, cameraclara.com

Kodak Ektar 100 vs Portra 160 and Portra 400

Ektar 100Portra 160 and 400
SpeedISO 100ISO 160 or 400
ColorHigh saturation, punchy blues and redsSofter, more muted colors (Blue Moon Camera)
Skin tonesOften red or pink on fair skinThe film reviewers name for portraits (Panorama Circle)
GrainFiner than Portra 160 (Tahusa) and Portra 400 (Dan Bullman)Fine, but more visible than Ektar
LatitudeHighlights go sooner and shadows recover less (Camera Clara, Jon Mullin)More forgiving of overexposure and shadow recovery
35mm price at Cute Camera Co. (Oct 28, 2026)$17.99Portra 400 from $24.99

Pick the Ektar 100 if

  • You shoot landscapes, travel or architecture in good light and want bold color.
  • You want the finest grain and sharpest scans: Josh Harmon finds Ektar scans sharper than Portra 160 or 400.
  • You want a Kodak professional film for less money per roll than Portra 400.

Pick the Portra 160 and 400 if

  • People are your main subject and you want natural skin.
  • You shoot in shade, dim light or indoors, where Portra 400's speed (ISO 400 against 100) helps.
  • You want a film that tolerates heavy overexposure.

Sources: panoramacircle.com, tahusa.co, youtube.com, cameraclara.com, jonmullin.com, cute.camera, joshharmonimages.com, bluemooncameracodex.com

Long exposures, night and pinhole on Ektar 100

Kodak's data sheet says no filter or exposure correction is needed from 1/10,000 second to 1 second, and to make tests for anything longer. Owners disagree on how soon it matters: Exaframe says reciprocity failure starts around 10 seconds, Blue Moon Camera says it stays fairly light until about 1 minute, and Lewis Collard rates the film's reciprocity characteristics as pretty poor.

Timothy Hutto, who shoots long exposures on a studio camera, surveyed what he could find and saw most sources say to use the metered time under 10 seconds, with a few adding time from 1 second. He and a Talk Photography member both found Kodak's long-exposure guidance thin, so bracket and keep notes.

For very long exposures, Lewis Collard notes that astrophotographers report cyan and green color shifts. The slow speed suits pinhole cameras: Blue Moon Camera calls Ektar its top recommendation for them.

Before a night or pinhole project, shoot a bracketed test roll at your usual exposure times.

Sources: kodakprofessional.com, shutter.lewiscollard.com, exaframe.com, bluemooncameracodex.com, timothyhutto.com, talkphotography.co.uk

Ektar 100 formats, scanning, developing and storage

Kodak Alaris lists Ektar 100 in 36-exposure 35mm, 120 pro packs and 4x5, 5x7, 6x7 and 8x10 sheets. Eastman Kodak, which has sold Kodak's professional films directly in the US and Canada since January 2026, lists three items: 35mm, a five-roll 120 pack and 10-sheet 4x5 boxes. Grain shrinks as the negative grows: Lewis Collard estimates 120 shows about half the grain of 35mm at the same enlargement, and Camera Clara prefers 120 for big scenic work. More on the trade-offs in 35mm vs 120 film.

The scan shapes Ektar more than most films. Exaframe says scanner auto-corrections tend to mishandle its color, and James Madison Photography decided early lab scans, not the film, were what she disliked. Ask for a rescan without auto-correction, or scan it yourself: Camera Clara converted Ektar negatives with Negative Lab Pro using a default preset, and Lewis Collard likes pulling some contrast out of his scans. See scanning film at home and the Negative Lab Pro guide.

Kodak's own page recommends storing it at 55°F (13°C) or lower, but says that is not required. Its data sheet adds 70°F (21°C) or lower in the sealed package for normal storage, and says to let refrigerated film warm to room temperature before opening it to avoid condensation.

Print Grain Index for Ektar 100, according to Kodak's data sheet (25 is the visual threshold for grain; lower is finer)
Negative4x6 print8x10 print16x20 print
35mmLess than 253866
120 (6x6 cm)Less than 25Less than 2538

Sources: kodakprofessional.com, kodak.com, en.wikipedia.org, shutter.lewiscollard.com, cameraclara.com, exaframe.com, jamesmadisonphotography.wordpress.com, kodakprofessional.com

What a roll of Ektar 100 costs

On October 28, 2026, a 35mm roll of Ektar 100 cost $13.99 to $19.00 at US camera shops and labs (four of the six listings say 36 exposures), 120 ran $12.95 to $14.00 a roll, and a 10-sheet box of 4x5 cost $73.50 at Pictureline. B&H, Adorama, Freestyle, KEH and Walmart could not be checked, so they are not listed.

  • Film Photography Project Store

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $13.99

    See listing

  • Pictureline (Salt Lake City, UT)

    New, sale price, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $16.25

    See listing

  • Richard Photo Lab

    New, 35mm, single roll

    $16.50

    See listing

  • Reformed Film Lab

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $17.00

    See listing

  • Cute Camera Co. (Austin, TX)

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $17.99

    See listing

  • Bellows Film Lab

    New, 35mm, single roll

    $19.00

    See listing

  • Film Photography Project Store

    New, 120, single roll

    $12.99

    See listing

  • Pictureline (Salt Lake City, UT)

    New, sale price, 120, single roll

    $12.95

    See listing

  • Bellows Film Lab

    New, 120, single roll

    $14.00

    See listing

  • Film Photography Project Store

    New, 120, 5-roll pack

    $64.99

    See listing

  • Pictureline (Salt Lake City, UT)

    New, sale price, 4x5 sheet film, 10 sheets

    $73.50

    See listing

  • Bellows Film Lab

    Expired, 120, single roll (expiry date not shown)

    $12.00

    See listing

Prices checked on October 28, 2026. They move every week, so treat them as a range, not a quote. The Film Photography Project Store's 120 five-pack works out to about $13.00 a roll ($64.99 / 5). Per frame, a $13.99 roll of 36-exposure 35mm comes to about $0.39 a shot ($13.99 / 36). At 12 frames a roll in a 6x6 camera (some give 13), the five-pack's $64.99 for 60 frames comes to about $1.08 a frame ($64.99 / 60). Reformed Film Lab adds a flat $5.95 shipping charge, free over $125. Bellows Film Lab's $12.00 roll of 120 is listed as expired.

Technical data

Film

Type
Low-speed, daylight-balanced color negative film
Speed
ISO 100/21°
Process
C-41
DX coding
Yes (35mm)
Kodak's claim
Finest-grain color negative film available

Formats

Kodak Alaris list
35mm (36 exp), 120 pro pack, 4x5, 5x7, 6x7 and 8x10 sheets
Sheet pack sizes
10 sheets (4x5, 8x10); 50 sheets (5x7, 6x7)
Eastman Kodak catalog
135-36 (7518525), 120 five-roll pack (7518566), 4x5 10 sheets (7520802)
Frames per 120 roll
15 or 16 (6x4.5), 12 or 13 (6x6), 10 (6x7)

Exposure

Light source
Daylight or electronic flash at ISO 100; ISO 32 with No. 80B (3400 K photolamps); ISO 25 with No. 80A (3200 K tungsten), per the data sheet
Long exposures
No correction from 1/10,000 to 1 second; test longer times, per the data sheet
Latitude
Not on the current data sheet; Lewis Collard and Casual Photophile say Kodak rates it two stops over, one under

Grain

Print Grain Index, 35mm
Less than 25 (4x6), 38 (8x10), 66 (16x20), per the data sheet
Print Grain Index, 120 (6x6)
Less than 25 (4x6 and 8x10), 38 (16x20), per the data sheet

Storage

Kodak's page
55°F (13°C) or lower recommended but not required
Data sheet
70°F (21°C) or lower, sealed; 55°F (13°C) for long periods

History

Original Ektar
A different film, introduced 1989, discontinued 1994 (120 in 1997)
Ektar 100 launched
September 2008, first in 35mm
4x5 and 8x10 sheets
From April 2010
US seller
Sold directly by Eastman Kodak in the US and Canada since January 2026

Video reviews worth your time

  • Testing The Exposure Limits Of Kodak Ektar 100

    Kyle McDougall, 2018

    Kodak Ektar 100 handles overexposure exceptionally well up to three stops, offering pleasing warmth and reduced contrast, but degrades quickly when underexposed.

    • 0:31 Loading Kodak Ektar 100 film into a Pentax 67 camera.
    • 1:13 Photographing the scene at normal, under, and overexposures.
    • 2:13 Reviewing scanned negatives frame by frame on a laptop.
    • 5:07 Side-by-side comparison grid of exposures from -3 to +6 stops.

  • Kodak Ektar 100 Review

    NegativeFeedback, 2019

    Kodak Ektar 100 is a fine-grained, highly saturated film ideal for vivid landscape photography, though its strong contrast and red undertones make it less suitable for portraits.

    • 0:26 Reviewer showing the Mamiya 6 MF camera used on the trip
    • 0:35 Kodak Ektar 100 film box and medium format roll
    • 1:45 Loading Kodak Ektar 100 into a medium format camera
    • 2:47 Example portrait photo highlighting Ektar's rendering of skin

  • EKTAR 100 vs PORTRA 400 - A Review and Comparison of Two Kodak Color Negative Films

    Dan Bullman Photography, 2017

    Kodak Ektar 100 delivers rich color saturation and fine grain ideal for landscapes and street photography, though its reddish rendering of skin tones makes Portra 400 a better choice for portraits.

    • 0:39 Introduction of Kodak Portra 400 and Ektar 100 film boxes
    • 1:28 Sample street photograph showing Ektar 100 color saturation
    • 3:54 Side-by-side comparison of Ektar 100 and Portra 400 train photos
    • 7:00 Side-by-side portrait comparison between Ektar 100 and digital capture

  • Kodak Ektar 100 C-41 Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

    David Hancock, 2019

    The reviewer regards Kodak Ektar 100 as an outstanding, fine-grained, extremely sharp color negative film with realistic color accuracy, though it can show a magenta cast on pale skin tones.

    • 01:08 Unboxing 120 and 35mm rolls of Kodak Ektar 100
    • 02:06 Showing 35mm photo samples to illustrate color and sharpness
    • 10:31 Breakdown of the spectral sensitivity dye-density graph
    • 12:02 Analysis of the characteristic density curves and dynamic range

  • Kodak Ektar 100 (Review + Sample Images)

    Gaku Lange, 2021

    The reviewer was pleasantly surprised by Kodak Ektar 100, praising its vibrant color saturation and exceptionally fine grain, though noting its steep shadow fall-off and punchy skin tones.

    • 0:15 Reviewer introduces the Kodak Ektar 100 film roll
    • 2:29 Loading the Ektar 100 into a Contax T3 camera
    • 2:49 Showcasing street photo results around Tokyo
    • 6:38 Summary review of color saturation and grain performance

Questions people ask about the Ektar 100

What is Kodak Ektar 100 best for?

Landscapes, travel, architecture and other subjects in bright light. Kodak recommends it for nature, travel, outdoor, fashion and product photography, and Blue Moon Camera calls it its top recommendation for pinhole cameras. Camera Clara says blues are its calling card: skies, water and anything with real blue in it.

Sources: kodakprofessional.com, bluemooncameracodex.com, cameraclara.com

Why do some people dislike Ektar 100?

Mostly skin tones and exposure. Fair skin often comes out red, pink or magenta, and several owners say underexposed frames go muddy or blue, so it forgives less than Portra. Bad scans play a part too: James Madison Photography decided the lab scans, not the film, were what she disliked at first.

Sources: jonmullin.com, panoramacircle.com, jamesmadisonphotography.wordpress.com

Why do fair-skinned portraits on Ektar come out reddish?

Ektar renders reds strongly, and most reviewers see light skin turn red or pink, especially in direct sun or when underexposed. Open shade, a little extra exposure and wider environmental framing help. For neutral skin, The Darkroom and Panorama Circle suggest Kodak Portra 160.

Sources: thedarkroom.com, emulsive.org, casualphotophile.com, panoramacircle.com

Should you overexpose Ektar 100?

A little, if you are unsure. Lewis Collard gives it a stop or two extra rather than bracketing, and some Flickr group owners rate it at EI 64 or 80. Camera Clara adds a caution: highlights clip sooner than on Portra, so don't overexpose it as heavily as you would Portra.

Sources: shutter.lewiscollard.com, flickr.com, cameraclara.com

Why do my Ektar 100 photos have a blue tint?

The usual causes are underexposure and the scan. Flickr group members call a blue cast the first sign of underexposure, and Josh Harmon sees blue shadows at box speed or under in daylight. A lab scanner on the wrong preset can also add a strong cast, so ask for a rescan before blaming the film.

Sources: flickr.com, joshharmonimages.com

Can you push Ektar 100 to ISO 400?

You can, but expect a stylized look. Lewis Collard got heavy contrast, super-saturated reds and an extreme blue shift at 400, and Tahusa warns of purple shadows; a Darkroom customer review stopped at ISO 200. Some Flickr posters and Shoot It With Film liked the punchier pushed result.

Sources: shutter.lewiscollard.com, tahusa.co, thedarkroom.com, flickr.com, shootitwithfilm.com

What is the reciprocity failure of Ektar 100?

Kodak's data sheet needs no correction from 1/10,000 second to 1 second and says to run tests for longer exposures. Owners disagree on when it matters: Exaframe puts the start around 10 seconds, Blue Moon Camera says it stays fairly light until about a minute, and Lewis Collard rates its reciprocity characteristics as pretty poor. Bracket night and pinhole shots until you know your results.

Sources: kodakprofessional.com, shutter.lewiscollard.com, exaframe.com, bluemooncameracodex.com

Is Ektar 100 truly the finest-grained color negative film?

That is Kodak's claim, and reviewers broadly back it. Casual Photophile sees virtually no grain in 35mm, and Blue Moon Camera could not find the grain on a 4x5 scan even at full zoom. Kodak's data sheet gives a Print Grain Index under 25, the visual threshold for grain, for a 4x6 print from 35mm.

Sources: kodak.com, casualphotophile.com, bluemooncameracodex.com, kodakprofessional.com

What people compare it with

  • Kodak Portra 160

    Softer color and more natural skin tones; reviewers' pick for portraits in good light when Ektar's saturation is too strong.

  • Kodak Portra 400

    The more flexible Kodak professional color film: two stops faster (ISO 400 against 100) and more forgiving of exposure mistakes, but pricier per roll.

  • Kodak Ektachrome E100

    Real color slide film (E-6) for the true slide look; Kodak Alaris lists it in 35mm, 120 and 4x5, 5x7 and 8x10 sheets.

  • Kodak Gold 200

    A cheaper Kodak color film; Jon Mullin calls Kodak's consumer films a much more affordable way to learn color photography.

Every source behind this page

Read them yourself. How we pick and count them is in our methodology.

Show all 51 sources

Manuals and references 18

Independent blogs 13

Forums 8

Editorial reviews 6

Video reviews 5

Retailer customer reviews 1

  • Film stocks

    Kodak Portra 160

    Kodak Portra 160 is a fine-grain ISO 160 color film, $13.99 to $17.99 a 35mm roll in Oct 2026. What 148 opinions say about skin tones, latitude and low light.

  • Film stocks

    Kodak Portra 400

    Kodak Portra 400 is an ISO 400 color film loved for skin tones and latitude. What 113 opinions say, how to expose and push it, and US prices from $15.99.

  • Film stocks

    Kodak Ektachrome E100

    Kodak Ektachrome E100 is ISO 100 E-6 slide film, $22.99 to $28.63 a 35mm roll in October 2026. What 147 opinions say about its color, grain and latitude.

  • Film stocks

    How to Push Film (and Pull It): Stops, Lab Fees and Dev Times

    How to push film: what a stop means, what to set on your camera, how to tell the lab, one-stop fees from $0 to $4, home development times and how to pull film.

  • Film stocks

    35mm vs 120 Film: Negative Size, Cost per Shot and Which to Pick

    35mm vs 120 film: common 120 frames are 2.7 to 5.4 times bigger than 35mm but give 8 to 16 shots a roll. Cost per frame, lab prices and which to pick.

  • Developing and scanning

    Scanning Film with a DSLR vs Flatbed: How to Scan Film at Home

    Scanning film with a DSLR, step by step: gear and October 2026 prices, exact camera settings, how it compares with a flatbed and fixes for common scan problems.