Camera Dojo

Kodak Ultramax 400: what it looks like and how to shoot it

The short answer

Kodak Ultramax 400 is a daylight-balanced ISO 400 color negative film (C-41) sold only in 35mm, and a 36-exposure roll cost $8.69 to $11.50 at US camera shops on October 28, 2026.

Reviewers like its punchy color, natural skin tones and forgiving exposure, and Analog.Cafe calls it maybe the best general-purpose ISO 400 film. The trade-offs are visible grain, color casts in gray or artificial light, and grainy, greenish shadows when it is underexposed.

Speed
ISO 400
Process
C-41
Format
35mm, 24 or 36 exp
Print Grain Index
46 (Analog.Cafe)
See sample photosWhat shooters say

Built from 121 opinions from 24 pages and videos. Not yet tested by Camera Dojo. Updated .

A Kodak Ultramax 400 35mm film cartridge beside its yellow and blue 24-exposure box on a white background
Photo: El Grafo, CC BY-SA 4.0

The short version

Ultramax is the roll people load for trips, family days and thrift-store point-and-shoots. It is one stop faster than Kodak Gold 200, so it copes better with shade and bright interiors, and it costs about $6 less per roll than Kodak Portra 400 at Brooklyn Film Camera ($11.50 against $17.50). It still likes light: give it a little extra exposure rather than too little, and expect more grain than Portra when you crop in, and less latitude in harsh contrast.

Good fit if

  • You want one color film for sun, shade and well-lit interiors.
  • You shoot a point-and-shoot or auto-exposure camera: the roll is DX-coded, so the camera sets ISO 400 itself.
  • You are learning film and want a cheap roll that forgives metering mistakes.
  • You like punchy, saturated color more than Portra's softer look.
  • You need a cheap test roll for a camera you just bought, as Derek Drapeau uses it.

Think twice if

  • You want fine grain for big prints or tight crops. Portra 400 and Ektar 100 are finer.
  • You shoot mostly under tungsten or mixed indoor light without flash. Colors drift, and a tungsten-balanced film such as CineStill 800T suits that work better.
  • You shoot mostly on gray, rainy days and dislike color correction. Analog.Cafe finds the shadow casts hard to fix, though Kubus Photo says it handles overcast light well.
  • You need 120 or sheet film. Ultramax 400 is sold in 35mm only.

Photos shot on Kodak Ultramax 400

Frames shot on Ultramax 400 by Wikimedia Commons contributors, in cameras from a Hanimex 35es to a Nikon EM; the reviews by Roberta Baker and Parallax Photographic show more.

What owners and reviewers say, topic by topic

We sorted 121 opinions about the Ultramax 400 from 24 pages and videos on 22 websites and channels. Each row shows how many people raised a topic and how many of them were positive. Open a row to read short quotes, each linked to its source.

Most of these opinions come from photographers' blogs, editorial reviews and five YouTube reviews. Reddit, DPReview and big-retailer reviews could not be read, so everyday owner voices are thin and the mix leans positive. PetaPixel's August 2026 review is quoted from a full-text copy on Head Topics and was sponsored by Blue Moon Camera and Machine, a Portland shop. No source discussed halation on Ultramax, so that topic is missing.

  1. Color48% positiveof 27

    Reviewers split almost evenly. Thirteen of the 27 who comment on color are positive, praising punchy, saturated color, especially in sun. Most of the rest report casts: some see a cool blue or purple lean, others yellow or reddish shadows, and several say gray weather and mixed light throw it off.

  2. Exposure latitude56% positiveof 16

    Most say it forgives exposure mistakes, especially overexposure, and some shoot it a stop over on purpose. Critics say underexposure turns shadows grainy and green, and that it holds less in harsh contrast than Portra.

  3. Price and availability67% positiveof 15

    Mostly praised as cheap and easy to find, even at drugstores. Critics say it is no longer cheap after price rises and that drugstore stock has been patchy.

  4. Grain25% positiveof 12

    Nearly everyone notices the grain. Most call it acceptable or even pleasing for an ISO 400 film, but it is clearly coarser than Portra 400 or Ektar, and one reviewer calls it the film's main drawback.

  5. Overall look73% positiveof 11

    Reviewers describe an honest, easygoing everyday film and a go-to for trips and family. One guide notes that experienced shooters sometimes find it unremarkable, and one lab prefers Portra's contrast.

  6. Skin tones67% positiveof 9

    Most who mention skin say it renders natural, flattering tones. The caveats are a yellow tint in some portraits or when overexposed, and one lab that says Portra does skin better.

  7. Low light and night56% positiveof 9

    More positive than negative: ISO 400 helps on gray days, in bright interiors and for tripod night shots. Two sources warn against dark scenes without flash, where shadows go grainy and green.

  8. Sharpness and detail57% positiveof 7

    Reviewers mostly call it sharp enough for everyday use, and one says enlargements hold up. It does not match the detail of Portra or Ektar, and one roundup finds it fuzzy at times.

  9. Pushing and pulling43% positiveof 7

    Pushing to 800 or 1600 works but adds contrast, grain and saturation, and Parallax's 1600 night roll blew some highlights. PetaPixel says ISO 100 to 800 needs no special development.

  10. Scanning and printing100% positiveof 4

    The few who mention it say it scans easily, with pleasant color on default scanner settings, and that the negatives dry flatter than Fujifilm's.

  11. Consistency100% positiveof 4

    All four voices praise its consistency, and one says she rarely has to correct colors to match what she saw.

PositiveMixedNegative

How to shoot Kodak Ultramax 400

Ultramax is easy to use. The two rules: don't starve it of light, and watch the color of the light.

  1. 1

    Set the camera to ISO 400

    The cartridge is DX-coded, so automatic cameras set ISO 400 themselves, per Cultured Kiwi. On a manual camera, set the film speed dial to 400.

  2. 2

    Start at box speed in good light

    Analogue Wonderland suggests ISO 400 with a shutter speed of 1/125 to 1/250 second in good light. Roberta Baker says it works especially well for landscapes, foliage and bright summer daylight.

  3. 3

    Lean toward overexposure

    Aly's Vintage Camera Alley shoots outdoor rolls at ISO 200, one stop over, and Cultured Kiwi prefers ISO 200 with normal development to pushing. PetaPixel says Kodak states two stops of overexposure tolerance and bets three works, while Analog.Cafe says three is too many.

  4. 4

    Don't underexpose

    PetaPixel puts the limit at one stop under, as with most color negative films. Below that, shadows go grainy and can turn green, so meter for the shadows in high-contrast scenes.

  5. 5

    Use flash or window light indoors

    The film is daylight-balanced (5500K, per Cultured Kiwi), so indoor bulbs and mixed light throw colors off. Kubus Photo says well-lit interiors work but dark bars need flash, and Kodak.com says the film extends flash range.

  6. 6

    Push only when you need the speed

    PetaPixel says you can rate it anywhere from ISO 100 to 800 with normal development, and at 1600 with a lab push. Pushing adds contrast, grain and saturation; see how to push and pull film.

  7. 7

    Load in subdued light and use any C-41 lab

    Kodak's handling notes, reprinted by Unique Photo, say to load and unload the camera in subdued light. Any lab that develops color negative film in C-41 chemistry can process it.

Sources: culturedkiwi.com, analoguewonderland.co.uk, robertabaker.com, alysvintagecameraalley.com, co.headtopics.com, analog.cafe, kubusphoto.com, kodak.com, uniquephoto.com

What Kodak Ultramax 400 looks like: color, grain and skin

Most reviewers describe bright, punchy, saturated color. PetaPixel calls it clean and poppy across the spectrum, with more contrast than Portra but less contrast and saturation than Ektar, and Roberta Baker likes its full greens and rich blues. Where they split is the cast: Brooklyn Film Camera calls it warm with Kodak yellow in the highlights, while Shoot It With Film saw cool blue and purple undertones and a note.com writer found it bluer than expected. The light matters more than the label. In sun it pops, and Analog.Cafe says blue or gray weather can leave casts in the shadows that are hard to correct.

The grain is visible. Analog.Cafe reads Kodak's Print Grain Index as 46 for a 4x6 print from 35mm, about the same as Kodak Gold (44) and a little more than Portra 400 (37); PetaPixel gives Ultramax 44 instead. Analog.Cafe adds that the grain is chunkier than Portra's but looks smoother because the granules are softer, and from Kodak's curves it estimates about 8 stops of dynamic range.

Skin tones are a strength when the exposure is right. Kodak promises accurate skin-tone reproduction, and Cultured Kiwi and Aly's Vintage Camera Alley both praise them, but PetaPixel and Cultured Kiwi see a yellow tint on skin when the film is overexposed.

For frames shot in cool light that come back with casts, Analog.Cafe shifts the shadows toward yellow and the highlights toward blue when editing.

Sources: co.headtopics.com, robertabaker.com, brooklynfilmcamera.com, shootitwithfilm.com, note.com, analog.cafe, mpex.com, culturedkiwi.com, alysvintagecameraalley.com

Kodak Ultramax 400 vs Gold 200

Ultramax 400Gold 200
SpeedISO 400ISO 200, one stop slower
Price at Brooklyn Film Camera (Oct 28, 2026)$11.50$9.50
Print Grain Index (Analog.Cafe)4644
ColorPunchy and saturated; reviewers split on a blue or yellow leanWarmer, at its best in bright sun (Shoot It With Film)
Gray, overcast daysKubus Photo says it handles them; Analog.Cafe sees shadow castsAnalog.Cafe recommends it for cool, overcast light

Pick the Ultramax 400 if

  • You shoot in changing light, shade or bright interiors.
  • You want faster shutter speeds in shade or with a slow lens.
  • You like punchier, more saturated color.

Pick the Gold 200 if

  • You shoot mostly in bright sun.
  • You want to spend about $2 less a roll ($9.50 against $11.50 at Brooklyn Film Camera).
  • You prefer a warmer palette: Kubus Photo says Ultramax's color profile is slightly cooler than Gold's.

Sources: brooklynfilmcamera.com, analog.cafe, shootitwithfilm.com, kubusphoto.com

Ultramax 400 vs Portra 400, Fujifilm 400 and CineStill 400D

Portra 400 is the step up. Last Good Film Lab found the two very similar at first glance, with Ultramax much punchier in color and contrast and Portra subtler throughout; a post on Phillip Reeve's blog says the general consensus is that Portra is a bit sharper with less grain, and Brooklyn Film Camera credits it with more latitude. At that shop Portra 400 costs $17.50 a roll against $11.50 for Ultramax.

Fujifilm 400, the box marked "made in the USA" that followed Fujifilm's April 2023 pause of Superia X-Tra 400, is a near twin. 35mmc's side-by-side found no difference in sharpness or grain, only a very slight yellow bias in the Fuji against a bluer one in Ultramax, and Cultured Kiwi says it is rebranded Ultramax because the datasheets and DX codes match. Neither Kodak nor Fujifilm confirms that in any source checked.

CineStill 400D is the other 400-speed option Analog.Cafe mentions: it is made from Kodak motion picture film, costs more, is harder to find and adds halation. For the full head-to-head with Kodak's cheaper sibling, see Kodak Gold 200 vs Ultramax 400.

How the usual alternatives differ from Ultramax 400 ($11.50 a roll), with Brooklyn Film Camera prices checked October 28, 2026
FilmPrice per rollHow it differs
Kodak Gold 200$9.50One stop slower, warmer, best in bright sun
Fujifilm 400$14Near-identical, slightly lower contrast, a little yellower
Kodak Portra 400$17.50Finer grain (Print Grain Index 37), softer color, more latitude
CineStill 400DNot checkedCosts more, harder to find, adds halation

Sources: lastgoodfilmlab.com, phillipreeve.net, brooklynfilmcamera.com, 35mmc.com, culturedkiwi.com, analog.cafe

Developing, scanning and storing Ultramax 400

Ultramax is standard C-41 film; Kodak designed it for Flexicolor C-41 chemistry, so any lab that develops color negatives can process it. Develop-only at Dwayne's Photo starts at $7.50 for 35mm, The Darkroom's mail-in develop and scan starts at $14, and Brooklyn Film Camera charges $18 a roll with medium-resolution scans ($16 for members). At home, Shoot It With Film shot it at box speed and developed it in CineStill's CS41 two-bath kit, which sells for $31.99 for 24 rolls, about $1.33 a roll ($31.99 / 24). Compare labs in how much it costs to develop film.

The scan shapes the look. Carlos Garcia found it easy to scan, with pleasant color on his scanner's default settings; Shoot It With Film used SilverFast's Kodak Ultramax 400 template on an Epson V600; and Cultured Kiwi says its slightly flat look leaves room to adjust contrast and color. PetaPixel warns that many lab scanners suppress grain and replace it with digital noise. Brooklyn Film Camera's 4K scan upgrade costs $12 a roll ($6 for members).

Kodak's storage instructions, reprinted on Unique Photo's product page, say to keep unexposed film at 21°C (70°F) or lower in the sealed package and to process it as soon as possible after exposure. For flights, TSA recommends carrying undeveloped film in your carry-on bag or asking for a hand inspection at the checkpoint.

Sources: mpex.com, dwaynesphoto.com, thedarkroom.com, brooklynfilmcamera.com, cinestill.film, shootitwithfilm.com, carlosgrphoto.com, culturedkiwi.com, co.headtopics.com, uniquephoto.com, tsa.gov

Kodak Ultramax 400 history: Gold 400, Ultramax and Kodak.com

Ultramax has had several names. PetaPixel traces it to Kodacolor Gold 400 in the late 1980s, renamed Kodak Gold 400 in 1997 and Kodak Ultramax 400 in 2007, and says it shares the T-Grain technology used in Portra 400. Aly's Vintage Camera Alley adds that the 2007 change came with an emulsion adjusted for digital scanning in labs, and that Kodak's first 400-speed color film was Kodacolor 400 in 1977.

Kodak Alaris distributed Kodak still films from 2013, as part of Kodak's Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and Eastman Kodak added Ultramax 400 to its own Kodak.com range on November 3, 2025, per Kosmo Foto. US shops now list the 36-exposure roll under two part numbers, 7518285 (Kodak.com's current catalog number) and 6034060; no source says the film inside differs.

Supply has been tight before. A 2023 post on Phillip Reeve's blog said you could be happy to find Portra or Ultramax in stock at all, and Fujifilm paused Superia X-Tra 400 in April that year. Cultured Kiwi's 2026 review says Ultramax is still in production.

Sources: co.headtopics.com, alysvintagecameraalley.com, kosmofoto.com, kodak.com, procam.com, phillipreeve.net, 35mmc.com, culturedkiwi.com

What a roll of Ultramax 400 costs

On October 28, 2026, a single 36-exposure roll of Ultramax 400 cost $8.69 to $11.50 at US camera shops, MPEX sold a 24-exposure roll for $7.99, and 36-exposure 3-packs were listed at $26.49 to $33.95 (two of them sold out). B&H, Adorama, Walmart, Freestyle and KEH could not be checked, so they are not listed.

  • MPEX

    New, 35mm, 24 exposures, single roll

    $7.99

    See listing

  • MPEX

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll (part 6034060)

    $8.69

    See listing

  • Procam (Michigan, Illinois, Ohio)

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll (part 7518285)

    $9.95

    See listing

  • Procam (Michigan, Illinois, Ohio)

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll (part 6034060)

    $9.99

    See listing

  • CineStill

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $9.99

    See listing

  • District Camera

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $10.49

    See listing

  • Glazer's Camera

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $10.49

    See listing

  • Pro Photo Supply

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $10.99

    See listing

  • Brooklyn Film Camera

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, single roll

    $11.50

    See listing

  • CineStill

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, 3-pack

    $26.49

    See listing

  • District Camera

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, 3-pack

    $27.95

    See listing

  • Unique Photo (New Jersey, Pennsylvania)

    New, 35mm, 36 exposures, 3-pack

    $28.95

    See listing

  • Film Supply Club

    New, sold out, 35mm, 36 exposures, 3-pack

    $26.99

    See listing

  • Glazer's Camera

    New, sold out, 35mm, 36 exposures, 3-pack

    $33.95

    See listing

Prices checked on October 28, 2026. They move every week, so treat them as a range, not a quote. Per roll, CineStill's 3-pack works out to about $8.83 ($26.49 / 3) and District Camera's to about $9.32 ($27.95 / 3). Analog.Cafe's July 2026 price report found Ultramax 400 got 2.6% cheaper over the previous six months, averaged across 13 major stores. More shops in [where to buy 35mm film](/film/where-to-buy-35mm-film/).

Technical data

Film

Type
High-speed, daylight-balanced color negative film
Speed
ISO 400/27°
Process
C-41 (Kodak Flexicolor chemicals)
Format
35mm (135) only
Exposures
24 or 36
DX coding
Yes
Color balance
Daylight (5500K)

Image, as reviewers measure it

Print Grain Index
46 (Analog.Cafe, from Kodak's data); PetaPixel says 44
Dynamic range
About 8 stops (Analog.Cafe estimate from Kodak's curves)
Rating range, normal development
ISO 100 to 800 (PetaPixel)
Underexposure limit
About one stop (PetaPixel)

Kodak catalog numbers

36 exposures
7518285
24 exposures
7518277
36 exposures, carded
7518244
3-pack, 24 exposures
7518319
3-pack, 36 exposures
7518335

History

Earlier names
Kodacolor Gold 400 (late 1980s), Kodak Gold 400 (1997)
Ultramax name since
2007
On Kodak.com since
November 3, 2025

Video reviews worth your time

  • Kodak Ultramax 400

    Matt Day, 2018

    Kodak Ultramax 400 is an affordable, easily overlooked consumer film that offers vibrant colors, pleasing skin tones, and excellent highlight retention when overexposed.

    • 0:24 Kodak Ultramax 400 boxes and film canister shown.
    • 1:48 Reviewer holds the Leica M6 used to shoot the film.
    • 2:43 Explanation of metering and rating the film at ISO 100.
    • 4:32 Sample photos taken on Kodak Ultramax 400 film.

  • Kodak UltraMAX 400 - Cheap & Reliable 35mm | ROLL REVIEW

    Analog Resurgence, 2020

    Kodak Ultramax 400 is a versatile, affordable consumer film that delivers reliable, balanced color rendering when shot at box speed.

    • 0:20 Overview of Kodak Ultramax 400 and consumer film choices
    • 1:36 Brief history of Kodak Gold 400 branding evolution
    • 2:26 Daytime outdoor sample photos showing colors and contrast
    • 4:06 Nighttime sample photos shot under streetlights

  • Kodak Ultramax 400 Review - Is this film a good alternative to pricey Portra 400?

    Ribsy, 2020

    Kodak Ultramax 400 is an affordable, versatile film stock with bold color saturation, making it great for casual everyday photography despite limited highlight retention in high-contrast light.

    • 0:56 Pricing and value breakdown
    • 2:17 Dynamic range and exposure evaluation
    • 3:24 Sharpness and grain analysis
    • 3:51 Color saturation and contrast review

  • Kodak UltraMax 400 Review! Cheap Film Stock with Impressive Results

    Skyler Wagoner, 2025

    The reviewer concludes that Kodak UltraMax 400 is an excellent budget-friendly film stock that yields vibrant warm colors, natural skin tones, and good detail, particularly when shot in even lighting.

    • 0:00 Beginning the portrait photoshoot outdoors.
    • 2:38 Overview of the Kodak UltraMax 400 test shoot.
    • 6:13 Evaluating film sharpness, grain structure, and color balance.
    • 10:58 Capturing portrait shots with kicked-up dust effects.

  • Is Kodak Ultramax 400 the Best Film for Night Photography?

    Reimann Pembroke, 2021

    The Kodak Ultramax 400 delivers clean results and performs remarkably well for long-exposure night photography.

    • 0:00 Introduction to night photography with Kodak Ultramax 400
    • 0:37 Loading the Canon rangefinder with Kodak Ultramax 400
    • 1:31 Reviewing long-exposure photo results from the first location
    • 8:53 Summary and final verdict on Kodak Ultramax 400

Questions people ask about the Ultramax 400

Is Kodak Ultramax 400 good for beginners?

Yes. Cultured Kiwi says its wide exposure latitude forgives metering mistakes, ISO 400 works in most light and every C-41 lab can develop it, and it calls Ultramax one of the easiest color films to find. Kubus Photo, a film lab, says Gold and Ultramax forgive two or more stops of exposure error while you learn.

Sources: culturedkiwi.com, kubusphoto.com

What is the difference between Kodak Ultramax 400 and Gold 200?

Ultramax is ISO 400 and Gold is ISO 200, so Ultramax is one stop faster, which buys faster shutter speeds in shade, changing light and bright interiors. Gold 200 looks warmer and does best in bright sun, according to Shoot It With Film, and Analog.Cafe rates their grain as about the same (Print Grain Index 44 for Gold, 46 for Ultramax). Gold costs a little less, $9.50 against $11.50 at Brooklyn Film Camera in October 2026. The full comparison is in [Kodak Gold 200 vs Ultramax 400](/film/kodak-gold-200-vs-ultramax-400/).

Sources: shootitwithfilm.com, analog.cafe, brooklynfilmcamera.com

Is Kodak Ultramax 400 discontinued?

No. Eastman Kodak lists Ultramax 400 on Kodak.com in 24- and 36-exposure 35mm rolls, and Kosmo Foto reports it joined Kodak's own Kodak.com range on November 3, 2025, after years of distribution by Kodak Alaris. Cultured Kiwi's 2026 review also says it is still in production. Stock at individual shops is uneven, so a sold-out listing does not mean the film is gone.

Sources: kodak.com, kosmofoto.com, culturedkiwi.com

Can you push Kodak Ultramax 400 to 800 or 1600?

Yes. PetaPixel says you can shoot it anywhere from ISO 100 to 800 without changing development and go to 1600 with a lab push. Parallax Photographic pushed a roll two stops to 1600 and got hand-holdable night shots with a lot more contrast and grain, a noticeable increase in saturation and some blown highlights, and suggests a one-stop push might have given less grain and more clarity. Cultured Kiwi says even a one-stop push adds noticeable grain and contrast.

Sources: co.headtopics.com, parallaxphotographic.coop, culturedkiwi.com

How many stops can you overexpose Kodak Ultramax 400?

Sources disagree. PetaPixel says Kodak states two stops and bets three works, Cultured Kiwi says three stops over still keeps ample highlight detail, and Analog.Cafe says you won't get away with three. A common middle ground is rating it at ISO 200, one stop over, as Aly's Vintage Camera Alley and Cultured Kiwi do; heavy overexposure adds a yellow tint to skin.

Sources: co.headtopics.com, culturedkiwi.com, analog.cafe, alysvintagecameraalley.com

Is Fujifilm 400 the same film as Kodak Ultramax 400?

Possibly, but no source we checked shows Kodak or Fujifilm confirming it. Fujifilm's "made in the USA" 400 arrived after it paused Superia X-Tra 400 in April 2023, and 35mmc's side-by-side found no difference in sharpness or grain, only a very slight yellow bias in the Fuji against a bluer one in Ultramax. Cultured Kiwi says it is rebranded Ultramax because the datasheets and DX codes match. More in the [Fujifilm 400 guide](/film/fujifilm-400/).

Sources: 35mmc.com, culturedkiwi.com

Is Kodak Ultramax 400 good for low light and night photography?

It handles lower light better than ISO 200 film, but it is not a true low-light stock. Kubus Photo says well-lit interiors work but dark bars need flash, and Aly's Vintage Camera Alley found indoor shadows grainy and dark green unless she overexposed. At night, Reimann Pembroke's video review finds it handles long exposures well, so bring a tripod; otherwise push it or, for artificial light, try a faster tungsten-balanced film such as [CineStill 800T](/film/cinestill-800t/).

Sources: kubusphoto.com, alysvintagecameraalley.com, youtube.com, parallaxphotographic.coop

Is Kodak Ultramax 400 a good alternative to Portra 400?

For everyday shooting, yes, if you like more punch. Last Good Film Lab found the two very similar at first glance, with Ultramax punchier in color and contrast, grainier, and less flexible when pushed or in odd light; Analog.Cafe gives Portra 400 a finer Print Grain Index (37 against 46). Portra costs more: $17.50 a roll against $11.50 for Ultramax at Brooklyn Film Camera.

Sources: lastgoodfilmlab.com, analog.cafe, brooklynfilmcamera.com

What people compare it with

  • Kodak Gold 200

    One stop slower and warmer, at its best in bright sun, and about $2 less a roll at Brooklyn Film Camera.

  • Kodak Portra 400

    Finer grain, softer color and more latitude for portraits and mixed light, at $17.50 a roll against $11.50.

  • Fujifilm 400

    Near-identical results in 35mmc's side-by-side, with a slightly yellower bias and lower contrast.

  • CineStill 400D

    A 400-speed color film made from Kodak motion picture stock; it costs more, is harder to find and adds halation.

Every source behind this page

Read them yourself. How we pick and count them is in our methodology.

Show all 45 sources

Manuals and references 21

Independent blogs 16

Video reviews 5

Editorial reviews 3

  • Film stocks

    Kodak Gold 200 vs UltraMax 400: Best Film for Beginners

    Kodak UltraMax 400 vs Gold 200: UltraMax is one stop faster for shade, indoors and reusable cameras. Gold is warmer and cheaper, about $8.45 to $10 a roll.

  • Film stocks

    Kodak Gold 200

    Kodak Gold 200 is a warm ISO 200 color film in 35mm and 120, $8.99 to $10.90 a 36-exposure roll. What 139 opinions say about grain, skin and low light.

  • Film stocks

    Kodak Portra 400

    Kodak Portra 400 is an ISO 400 color film loved for skin tones and latitude. What 113 opinions say, how to expose and push it, and US prices from $15.99.

  • Film stocks

    Fujifilm 400

    Fujifilm 400 is a made-in-USA ISO 400 color film, $10.99 to $14 a roll in October 2026. What 61 opinions say about its look, grain, pushing and the Kodak link.

  • Film stocks

    How to Push Film (and Pull It): Stops, Lab Fees and Dev Times

    How to push film: what a stop means, what to set on your camera, how to tell the lab, one-stop fees from $0 to $4, home development times and how to pull film.

  • Developing and scanning

    How Much Does It Cost to Develop Film? 2026 Prices

    A roll of 35mm film costs $5 to $11.50 to develop at US labs, or $11.50 to $29 with scans. Prices from 12 labs and the big chains, checked October 2026.