Vanguard Supreme 53F Hard Case
Vanguard Supreme 53F
We have looked at different types and styles of camera bags but the Vanguard 53F isn’t your normal camera bag. The Supreme 53F is a hard-sided case more at home in the cargo compartment of an airplane than it is being used as a daily equipment hauler. While other companies selling hard cases have been around for many years, Vanguard has a lot to live up to. Let’s take a look at at the Supreme 53F and see if Vanguard has succeeded in building a better mouse trap.
53F with Handle Extended
Overview
Vanguard’s Supreme line of cases are watertight and airtight up to a depth of 15 feet, dustproof, virtually indestructible, resistant to corrosion, and can withstand extreme climate variations. All of the Supreme cases are design to withstand temperature variations from -40° to 203°. The Supreme cases have quick release latches that are easy to use, and the comfort grip handle is ideal for carrying heavy equipment. With pad lock receptacles on each case, they are ideal for airline travel.
Features
The Supreme 53F is as rugged of a case as you are going to find anywhere. The case itself in extremely strong and durable with very well designed latches that lock easily and securely. The retractable handle locks into place in both the extended and retracted positions. The main handles have nice padding to make it more comfortable to carry. Internally, an O-ring helps keep the case water and dust resistant while the octagonal pluck-foam allows for almost any shape of object.
Secure Latches
- Water, air and dust tight
- Resistant to 264.5 pounds weight pressure
- Automatic pressure equalization valve
- Padded handles
- Metal lined padlock holes
- Waterproof name tag
- Locking travel handle
- Two layers of thick pluck-foam
Specifications
- Inside dimensions: 22†x 17 3/4†x 7 7/8â€
- Outside dimensions: 24 3/4†x 20 1/2†x 9 1/2â€
- Weight: 22.93lbs
Usage
Rubberized Handles and Pressure Relief Valve
The 53F is nice and big, too big for carry-on luggage on an airplane but not too big to be considered oversize for regular check-in luggage. The wheels roll smooth on flat surfaces but are too small to work well off-road or and in grass. With two layers of foam included, you could have two levels of regular camera gear or remove one for larger items like studio strobes. The travel handle locks securely when retracted so you don’t have to worry about it coming out when it is being shipped.
Results
Having used other hard cases that are similar, the others just don’t stack up to the Supreme 53F. The latches are the best I have seen on cases of this type and the padded handles make it more comfortable to pick up when loaded. Knowing that when the case is closed my gear is safe from water and dust because of the integrated O-Ring gives you piece of mind. The only thing I would change if I could is the thickness of the pluck-foam. The 53F comes with 2 very thick sheets of foam but I would prefer 3 or 4 thinner sheets for more versatility but that is just being picky. It’s not everyday that you need a super rugged hard case, but when you do, the Vanguard Supreme series of cases is as good as it gets and with a street price of around $230, you get quite a case for the money.
Big Roomy Case
Product Review Scorecard
| Features: | 5 |
| Setup: | 5 |
| Usage: | 5 |
| Results: | 5 |
| Price: | 5 |
|
Overall: |
5 |
Author: Kerry Garrison
Popularity: 2%
[...] the original post here: » Blog Archive Camera Dojo > Product Reviews > Vanguard Supreme … Share and [...]
really? I found that the Vanguard products to be sub-par for professional work. I have found the plastic, particularly the latches, to be inferior to Pelican. Not to mention the fact that Pelican is an industry standard, has numerous configurations/ replacement parts for customization, and that Pelican is about 10-15% cheaper.
I have been using Pelican cases for 20+ years, in various unforgiving situations, and never had a problem.
BUT, i noticed you have quite a few positive reviews of Vanguard products~ any conflict of interest there?
I don't think that TWO reviews constitutes “quite a few”. I also had some things about the Pampas bag that I didn't like. In comparing my Pelican cases to the Vanguard cases I did like the Vanguard cases better. That's my opinion based on using Pelican cases for years. I actually preferred the Vanguard latches over the Pelican and found them easier to work with.
So no, there is no conflict of interest, I state my opinions both good and bad and try to provide enough information to help people make their own decisions and very much welcome opposing comments like yours to give an alternative view on a particular product.
understood- i just see alot of Vanguard on your site~ PMA Vids, and other mentions~ weird for a company that has a relatively small impact on the professional world. (you reviewed only one Bogen Manfrotto product, which has a much broader scope in the Pro world)
Seems kinda like they make 'gadgets' for the PMA world, not actual pro shooters.
One question~ you are headed to Africa on an assignment. Would you pick a proven Pelican Case? or this Vagabond? In my experience the answer is a resounding Pelican!
Vanguard stood out to me at PMA as a company to watch and I am trying out some of their products based on that. I also have one of their ball heads which is really nice although I prefer my manfrotto grip-style for what I do.
I have no doubt I would trust my gear to the Vanguard case, they are tested to be waterproof to 5 meters, the padding is better than the Pelican (again, my opinion), the latches seem solid and the padlock mounts have metal inserts and I like the handle system better than the Pelican.
really? I found that the Vanguard products to be sub-par for professional work. I have found the plastic, particularly the latches, to be inferior to Pelican. Not to mention the fact that Pelican is an industry standard, has numerous configurations/ replacement parts for customization, and that Pelican is about 10-15% cheaper.
I have been using Pelican cases for 20+ years, in various unforgiving situations, and never had a problem.
BUT, i noticed you have quite a few positive reviews of Vanguard products~ any conflict of interest there?
I don't think that TWO reviews constitutes “quite a few”. I also had some things about the Pampas bag that I didn't like. In comparing my Pelican cases to the Vanguard cases I did like the Vanguard cases better. That's my opinion based on using Pelican cases for years. I actually preferred the Vanguard latches over the Pelican and found them easier to work with.
So no, there is no conflict of interest, I state my opinions both good and bad and try to provide enough information to help people make their own decisions and very much welcome opposing comments like yours to give an alternative view on a particular product.
understood- i just see alot of Vanguard on your site~ PMA Vids, and other mentions~ weird for a company that has a relatively small impact on the professional world. (you reviewed only one Bogen Manfrotto product, which has a much broader scope in the Pro world)
Seems kinda like they make 'gadgets' for the PMA world, not actual pro shooters.
One question~ you are headed to Africa on an assignment. Would you pick a proven Pelican Case? or this Vagabond? In my experience the answer is a resounding Pelican!
Vanguard stood out to me at PMA as a company to watch and I am trying out some of their products based on that. I also have one of their ball heads which is really nice although I prefer my manfrotto grip-style for what I do.
I have no doubt I would trust my gear to the Vanguard case, they are tested to be waterproof to 5 meters, the padding is better than the Pelican (again, my opinion), the latches seem solid and the padlock mounts have metal inserts and I like the handle system better than the Pelican.