http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/ Helping you make the most out of your photography Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:09:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-2530 kgarrison Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:24:07 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-2530 bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 - f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 - f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will. bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 – f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 – f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-2529 Bryan Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:16:56 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-2529 This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better. This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-529 kgarrison Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:24:07 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-529 bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 - f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 - f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will. bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 – f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 – f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-528 Bryan Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:16:56 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-528 This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better. This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-772 Anonymous Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:24:07 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-772 bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 - f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 - f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will. bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 – f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 – f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-771 Anonymous Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:16:56 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-771 This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better. This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-526 kgarrison Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:01:40 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-526 Its a good way to save money I guess. Its a good way to save money I guess.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-770 Anonymous Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:01:40 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-770 Its a good way to save money I guess. Its a good way to save money I guess.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-525 kais Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:50:47 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-525 Why no USM? Bummer. Why no USM? Bummer.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-524 Canon announces EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS : businessuu Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:49:13 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-524 [...] Original post by KerryG [...] [...] Original post by KerryG [...]

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-769 Anonymous Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:50:47 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-769 Why no USM? Bummer. Why no USM? Bummer.

]]> http://cameradojo.com/2008/08/26/canon-announces-ef-s-18-200mm-f35-56-is/comment-page-1/#comment-768 Anonymous Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:49:13 +0000 http://cameradojo.com/?p=673#comment-768 [...] Original post by KerryG [...] [...] Original post by KerryG [...]

]]>